2020年3月28日星期六

K8IROS Mark II Performance Review

Spencer Dinwiddie created his own brand and footwear line, and they are better than you might expect. Click through for our K8IROS Mark II performance review.
Traction
I never had the chance to grab the K8IROS 8.1, but we have some hoop jordan members that had and they collectively agree that the traction was lacking. I’m not sure if those that bought the original model were able to provide feedback or not, but the traction redesign was a main point of focus for the Mark II.
The midfoot and heel design look similar to the original, but the forefoot was completely overhauled. Radial traction was used for the majority of the forefoot and it’s worked great on every court I’ve taken them on. From the local 24 Hour Fitness, to LifeTime to random invites that have me playing in churches. Traction was not only not an issue, but good enough to where I have the shoe in my gym bag still [after testing] just in case I need something with traction that is more reliable than whatever I might be testing next.
I was fortunate enough to be able to play in both the solid rubber and translucent rubber versions of the shoe and while I choose to play in the Kronos colorway [over the Graffiti] the outsoles both played damn near identical. The rubber is tacky, but doesn’t attract dust like a Swiffer. It also hasn’t frayed at all which is weird since almost all shoe brand’s rubber start to fray after a few wears. However, I still wouldn’t expect them to last super long outdoors, but my time outdoors was pleasant due to the cushion.

Cushion

KronoFoam is used for the midsole. It’s a Pebax foam that’s been implemented full length and it offers a bouncy ride from heel to toe. There is a minor heel to toe drop which makes the heel a bit more squishy than the forefoot which is why there is a TPU panel at the rear to help stabilize the area.
Most will ask for some sort of comparison to a cushion that they may be more familiar with and all I can really compare it to is adidas’ Bounce — only this is a bit more bouncy.
The foam itself is on the softer side so using it within a carrier foam or using a TPU retaining wall — like the Way of Wade 8 — would allow the foam to be as springy as it is while ensuring maximum stability.

Materials

Textiles are used along the entire upper and it is very similar to what the Jordan Why Not Zer0.3 used. The Jacquard style knit is strong and tight while remaining flexible enough to allow you to lace them up straight out of the box without needed to break them in much.
There are some areas of thin TPU fuse-like material in high-wear areas such as the toe. It’s also used along the eyestay to try and prevent the textile from tearing after you’ve laced them up to your liking.
So far, everything has been durable, comfortable and form fitting. Although, that last bit might be due to the sizing.

Fit

They fit a bit short and only come in full sizes. This means that there are no 1/2 sizes available like 8.5, 9.5 and so on. I went true to size and my toes are right at the rubber — luckily the materials are soft enough to not cause black nails. So, my recommendation would be to go true to size if you wear a whole size — if you wear a size 9 then order a size 9. They will be snug but they’ll also be secure. If you wear a size 9 and go up to the next available size [10] then they’ll likely be too long for you and you’ll lose all security and support. If you happen to wear a 1/2 size [like a size 9.5] then going to a size 10 would be your best bet.
On-court, the lockdown was great. The lacing is asymmetrical and forces the upper to wrap around the foot tightly and securely. Again, this may be due to how snug the shoe is, so this may be different for those that wear 1/2 sizes.

Support

All of the features you’ve come to expect from basketball shoes are here. Heel counter — check. Midfoot shank — check. Outrigger — check. Yup, it’s all here. Everything works really well together as well.
However, one change I’d like to have seen was a slightly wider forefoot. The midsole is soft, as is the upper, so something a bit wider, that cups the foot a bit, would be great for added stability. The way the shoe fits allows everything to work perfectly, but if you had a bit more wiggle room inside the shoe it may cause a bit of instability on certain movements. This wouldn’t be needed if the foam was inside of a carrier foam or had a TPU retaining wall, but as it is right now, that is what I would have changed.

Overall

Overall, the air force 1 was a pleasant surprise. I wasn’t expecting much, but was hoping for the best. Turns out the shoe is solid in every area and pretty beastly. Cushion is solid. Traction is really solid. Fit might be a bit weird for some with the whole size only offerings. And support is solid as well.
It’ll be interesting to see where the line goes from here. Hopefully this model does well enough to warrant a third model in the near future.
If you were interested in checking out the K8IROS Mark II they’re available here.

2020年3月23日星期一

Air Jordan 34 SE Performance Review

The best Air Jordan game shoe since the… Air Jordan 34? Sure, why not?
Not much has changed between the Air Jordan 34 and the new Air Jordan 34 SE. However, the aspects that were tweaked I feel were for the better. Although, it really depends on what your personal needs are as they pertain to basketball shoes, but the changes here are enough to warrant raving about.
TRACTION
The outsole hasn’t changes at all in terms of tooling molds or aesthetics, but the rubber compound has changed from solid rubber to translucent rubber. For me, I didn’t notice a difference between the two models as the herringbone was just as aggressive and grippy as the regular version of the AJ34.
As it spreads across the outsole in fan-like fashion, the outsole performed just as good as it looks. Like the Air Jordan XX9, the traction has a sneaky bite that isn’t squeaky. It took me a little bit of break-in time for it to have that stop-on-a-dime type of grip, but it was worth the short wait.
CUSHION
As I had said in the Air Jordan 34 Performance Review, this is the best Zoom Air experience I’ve ever had — and I’ve had many Zoom Air experiences over the years.
I jokingly consider myself a Zoom Air connoisseur as Zoom Air is my absolute favorite cushion (when done right) of all-time. The Air Jordan 34 SE not only implements Zoom Air correctly, in a way you can feel, but it’s also done in a way I’ve never felt before. Ever. Well, until the Air Jordan 34, of course.
The forefoot is springy, yet supportive. It’s responsive, yet offers an incredible balance of stability and court feel. It has a snap to it that feels like it propels you forward with your stride.
At the rear there is a large volume Hex Zoom Air unit, and I was actually able to feel it whenever I’d crash on my heel. For those that prefer or require heel and forefoot cushioning, this might be one of the best shoes on the market that will offer you just that.
MATERIALS
The materials are one area that was noticeably different between the AJ34 and the SE edition. Where the original model didn’t offer any premium materials at all, the SE edition offers a but of premium with a a bit of synthetics.
Many expect a premium build when it comes to an Air Jordan, but those same people will then complain that the premium build is too heavy. While some may still complain with a setup like this, I found it to be a good balance between lightweight performance and a premium build that reminds me of the good ‘ol days. The upper broke-in quickly, has maintained its shape and still looks like a beast once zipped up.
This version of the shoe should please both types of athletes — those that prefer premium builds and those that prefer lightweight performance.
FIT
I went true to size and that is what I would recommend for most people. I feel there is just enough space inside the shoe so that most foot shapes should fit snug, but not in a suffocating way.
Lockdown was really solid on the original Air Jordan 34 once you got the laces adjusted to where you’d like them to be, but the lockdown on the Air Jordan 34 SE enhances the lockdown thanks to the zipper shroud. One of the main reasons why laces will never go out of style. Again, the build breaks in nicely, so while you may feel the shoe is a bit too tight to start, after some running around then you should feel like you just had an Air Jordan tailored to your foot shape.
The zippers lock into place for anyone that may be wondering. If you’ve been around since the Nike Zoom Glove days then you already know that zippers on basketball shoes, while cool looking, tend to burst open and never work as well as intended. These locking zippers haven’t done that (so far) and don’t show any signs of doing that in the near future. You can zip them up or down with east when the toggle is upright, but once you fold them down then they’re locked into place. I wish Jordan Brand has opted for this type of zipper on the Jordan Jumpman Swift 6 Retro as those burst open at the zipper as soon as I take a step.
The support on the Air Jordan 34 was exceptionally good, even with all of the lightweight materials in place, but the Air Jordan 34 SE has me searching for a flaw. Yes, I found them to be that good.
The heel counter is built more traditionally when compared directly to the original 34. Instead of having the shoe built around the heel, the heel counter is hidden within the shoe just like it has been on shoes for decades. Because of this I never encountered the same digging into my foot feeling that I had with the original 34. The only thing I had to break-in was the upper/build with how snug the zipper enclosure was once zipped up.
There are still performance woven underlay materials, but with the exterior build being more like a normal shoe you end up with a layered build that supports the foot in all facets of movement. Then the Eclipse Plate really takes everything from there.
This Pebax chassis worked better than any of the previous FlightSpeed/FlightPlate iterations for me. It kept the entire tooling torsionally strong and rigid, but also maintained enough flex in the forefoot so I didn’t feel like I was wearing a boot instead of a sneaker.
The Air Jordan 34 was my favorite basketball shoe of 2019. Meanwhile, it’ll be difficult to find a basketball shoe better than the Air Jordan 34 SE in 2020 — especially if releases continue to get pushed back due to the Coronavirus.
If the Air Jordan 34 was like playing basketball in a stripped down no nonsense F1 Race Car the Air Jordan 34 SE feels like a Cadillac with the F1 engine and tires. A little more elegance added but still a performance beast when all is said and done.
If you prefer to keep your shoes as light as possible then the Air Jordan 34 is where its at. However, if you wanted all the features of the 34 with some subtle upgrades then the Air Jordan 34 SE might be your next favorite hoop shoe.

2020年3月16日星期一

Nike Lunar TR1 Performance Review

I’ve used plenty of trainers over the years, but the Nike Lunar TR1 is one of the best training shoes that I have used in awhile.
Nike Lunar TR1 Performance Review 1Traction – The Nike Lunar TR1 has a pressure-mapped traction intended to give it grip on all surfaces. Whether it was the weight room, a wood surface, or turf I found that I had enough traction to do what I needed. On turf I usually recommend using some sort of cleat, but if all you have is the air jordan then you can definitely make due. The outsole has rubber nodes which gives you traction which provides ample traction in a pretty wide variety of surfaces, and the rubber used is fairly durable.
Nike Lunar TR1 Performance Review 2Cushion – This was one of the first things that I noticed about this shoe. When I first put it on, I immediately felt the Lunarlon. Lunarlon is my favorite cushioning system that Nike offers, and I was really happy to see it implemented in a trainer to where it does not take away from its purpose. With a training shoe, you want to make sure that it does not take away from support/ stability, and these take care of cushion while remaining stable. Responsiveness was decent while still providing a little impact protection, especially when performing explosion exercises. One of the things that they advertised was a re-engineered Lunarlon cushion, and I really liked what they have done. They definitely feel different than what you’d get out of one of their runners, and even their basketball line, but still being the Lunarlon that I’ve come to love. Hopefully we’ll see this cushion source used more with upcoming trainers, and I’d love to see where it evolves.
Nike Lunar TR1 Performance Review 3Materials – The kyrie 6 uses Nike’s Fuse material along with mesh in key flex zones. The mesh and textile upper with offer a lightweight no-sew construction which was lightweight yet supportive. I never felt like I was dragging my foot around during workouts, but I never felt like I wasn’t protected during harsher routines. Overall, I think that the materials were chosen well to ensure durability throughout the off-season while still providing you with something that is lightweight.
Nike Lunar TR1 Performance Review 4Fit – When I first put on the shoe they felt a little tight and I could tell that they would require some break-in time. By my 3rd session they began to break-in nicely to where they never felt too restrictive. The shoe keeps you locked in, and I never experienced any internal slippage while working out. I worked on everything from agility to weightlifting, even some on-field running, and felt no slippage and was very impressed with how the shoe held up.

Nike Lunar TR1 Performance Review 5Support – This is always big in a training shoe because regardless of all other attributes you need ample support without restriction in order to comfortably perform all of your exercises. Luckily the TR1 does just that. You are low to the ground, which increases your balance and stability, and you are given just enough cushion to make long sessions comfortable from beginning to end. Everything from the way they fit to the way they flex allows you to get the job done in the gym and on the field, all in a lightweight package.
Overall – The TR1 offers a bit of everything that you might look for in a trainer. You can take care of things in the gym, on the track, and on the field. Strengthening, conditioning, agility and pretty much anything you throw at them they can handle. My personal favorite trainer has been the Nike Zoom Revis, and while these don’t offer as much cushioning as those, these offer more support and stability. I’ve enjoyed every workout I’ve done with the TR1 and they continue to be my go-to trainer during the off season.
You can find these now at tons of retailers – some for under retail – Finish Line, Nike Store, hoop jordan, Champs Sports & Dick’s Sporting Goods are just some of the retail spots.

2020年3月14日星期六

Adidas SL20 Performance Review

The adidas SL20 is one of the first running shoes to feature adidas’ new Lightstrike cushioning. We’ve been waiting for Lightstrike to come to running shoes since it’s debut last year in the adidas yeezy 350 v2 basketball shoe. Lightstrike is lightweight while also providing a nice well-balanced ride. Does it work for running? Let’s find out…

Cushion

Drew: I really like Lightstrike for running. I like it enough that I wore the adidas SL20 in a recent 10k race. At around 8 ounces, it’s just light enough to use as a race day shoe (though probably not if you’re an elite runner).
The Lightstrike is actually light enough that the majority of the SL20’s weight comes from the upper. Most shoes are bottom heavy so having this one be reversed feels great. It makes your brain believe you don’t have much on your feet. Mentally, that’s great during speed workouts and on race days. I constantly found myself reaching for the SL20 before speed workouts.
The impact protection is also top notch. There’s only 14mm of Lightstrike in the forefoot but I never felt too much ground impact. Because there’s so little foam, I also expected the foam to bottom out on long runs or after I put a bunch of miles on the shoes. But here I am with 65+ miles in the shoes, having done a couple 10+ mile runs in them, and they still feel great.
Again, Lightstrike is great for running. I’m convinced adidas is just scratching the surface of what’s possible with a Lightstrike-based running shoe. The fact that the first iteration is so good is a great sign of things to come.
Jodi: Being married to Chris, I’ve heard tons of great things about Lightstrike in the basketball world, so I was pretty excited to see what it was all about. I’m actually surprised it didn’t hit the running world first since in a lot of ways, us runners are guinea pigs. I have to say, the cushion system lives up to the hype. It’s flexible, bouncy, and light. And has great impact protection. Every time I ran in these I felt like a sprinter, super quick. And my mile splits for those days reflected the feeling. Placebo effect? Maybe. But I’m not complaining about it.

Traction

Drew: Continental rubber is adidas’ go-to rubber compound and they’ve used it to great effect on the SL20. It rained the night before my recent 10k and the entire course was still wet when we toed the line at 7am. After the race, I heard several people complain that the roads felt slippery and that they couldn’t get great traction. I had to think about why they would have problems because I didn’t even notice the moisture. The SL20’s outsole gripped just like a normal day despite the wet conditions.
It wasn’t a surprise because while training in the SL20 I ran in rainstorms and several other iffy conditions and never had a problem with the traction. It’s one of those shoes where you don’t even have to think about your footing because every footfall is secure.
Jodi: Continental rubber is my jam, so I’m always happy when adidas uses it on its runners. I think the way they incorporate it with the stretch web pattern not only helps for great grip on the roads but also helps with whatever cushion system is being used. It’s just another great flexible layer to keep all your joints happy.

Support

Drew: The support is solid enough to compete with most everyday trainers. Adidas included their standard Y-shaped Torsional plate at the midfoot, went with a fairly beefy heel counter that extends beyond the heel on both the medial and lateral sides of the foot. The SL20 uses a fuse overlay along the bottom third of the shoe that starts at the heel and extends all the way to the forefoot on both sides of the upper. It does the job of really keeping you on the footbed. Then the ball of the foot also sits ever so slightly inside the Lightstrike midsole to help prevent rollovers. Finally, the midsole flares out a bit on both sides of the forefoot to provide a wider base for pushing off.
It’s a full package of support despite the lightweight nature of the shoe. I feel adidas went above and beyond what it’s expected from an everyday trainer in this weight class.
Jodi: As Drew has already stated, adidas really went all out making sure it would be next to impossible to not feel supported by the SL20. The heel cup is super rigid and extended along both sides of your foot. Then up top they gave you plenty of padding that wraps all the way around to the where the collar meets your ankle. And you can see your midsole peeking way out when you’re standing in them. You would have to land pretty awkwardly for your ankle to roll in these guys.

Materials

Drew: The SL20 features a typical mesh upper with fuse overlays. The tongue is a thin, stretchier mesh that is sewn to the upper. The laces are fairly typical and the insole is extremely thin and doesn’t really help the step-in comfort at all. So while the materials are pretty blah, they do the job, and allow adidas to keep the SL20 at the $120 price point. I like the trade offs they made because the price is a huge selling point of this shoe.
Jodi: There is absolutely no stretch in the materials, not even anywhere on the tongue, which is also attached to the upper. And because of those two things, I really gotta talk about the fit.

Fit

Drew: The adidas SL20 fits true to size. Some narrow footers may notice some puffiness in the toe box when they lace the shoe up tight. This is a result of the way adidas sewed the tongue to the upper. The tongue/upper combo could have been executed better but in practice the excess toe box material didn’t annoy me or get in the way. This is where using a flexible mesh helps hide the issue. The thin tongue could also fold up a little while putting the shoe on but the pull tab helps sort that out.
It’s not a perfect upper but it gets the job done and let’s the real star of the shoe, the Lightstrike cushioning, shine.
Jodi: Just in case anyone is new to my running reviews, I’m a wide footer. So if you are also a wide footer you’re going to want to stay tuned. As fantastic as this shoe was in the cushion department I struggled greatly with how the shoe fit. I feel like the length was half a size too long, but I could not have gone down a half size because there was no stretch in the upper and the shoe fit me really snug. Also, the tongue that was attached to the upper would somehow fold on itself always on my left foot and it would run between the bones on top of my foot. So I’d have to work at getting that shoe on just right almost every time I’d be getting ready to get out the door. It’s still a great shoe despite those things, definitely not a deal breaker for me. But they are used now for runs that I know will be under 45 minutes. Anything over that and I know I’m going to be feeling uncomfortable pretty quickly.

Overall

Drew: The adidas SL20 proves that Lightstrike cushioning in running shoes is a great option. For $120, you get an amazing cushioning experience, top tier traction, solid support, basic materials, and a few ignorable fit issues. But even if it was just the Lightstrike experience alone, I’d recommend these shoes. It’s a cushion that’s really fun to run in and worth the money.
Jodi: I’m pretty happy with what adidas did with its first Lightstrike runner. Dare I say that the cushion could take over the almighty Boost? I can definitely see it being used in a lot of future runners. In fact, I hope they do. If you’re looking for a runner that feels fast, has solid cushion, great support, excellent traction and you have an average sized foot, I’d definitely recommend these. If you have wide feet like me or even very narrow feet, I’d go in store and try them on first. Make sure you can handle the way they fit because like Drew and I both said, due to the way the upper is constructed there’s no way to hide any flaws.

2020年3月7日星期六

Nike Adapt BB 2.0 Performance Review

Are laceless basketball shoes the future? We find out in our Nike Adapt BB 2.0 Performance Review.

Traction

My two top traction setups have been implemented in both the Nike Adapt BB and the Nike Adapt BB 2.0. The radial coverage in the original model was decent, but there were many times, on every surface I played on, where there would be some grip inconsistencies. My experience with the Adapt BB 2.0 wasn’t any different despite herringbone being used full length.
I suppose the patterns used could be considered as the reason why each of the Adapt models gripped the court as they well as they did — when they did — whereas the rubber compound could be to blame for its inconsistent nature. Nike has used translucent rubber many times over the decades and some work perfectly while others are like the Adapt BB — disappointed.
I will say that the grip wasn’t bad enough for me to stop testing the shoe altogether, but it was inconsistent enough that I would not choose to play in this shoe over something like the Air Jordan 34 or Nike Kyrie 6 — both of which cost less than half the total price of the Adapt BB 2.0.
Adapt BB 2.0 Cushion

Cushion

The cushion has been a solid improvement over the original Adapt BB. While both versions utilize Cushlon midsoles, the Adapt BB 2.0 brought Zoom Turbo into the mix.
In case you were unaware, I love Nike’s Zoom Turbo setup. It’s low profile, springy and ultra responsive. It’s everything I love about Zoom Air setups and it’s always been done right since the cushioning unit sits just under the forefoot versus being encased in a firm foam — which ultimately restricts the feel and movement of the Zoom bag. If you want to try Zoom Turbo as an insole, eBay seller confident2shop sells this insole that comes really close to mimicking Zoom Turbo’s feel.
I never found the Cushlon setup of the original to be poor — I also enjoy Cushlon as a foam on it’s own thanks to my years playing in the older CP3 models from Jordan Brand — but this was a noticeable upgrade that I feel almost anyone would enjoy. Cushlon has a rubbery feel under-foot so when it is coupled with Zoom Air you get a setup that feels like it’s propelling you without you feeling like you’re unstable.
Adapt BB 2.0 Materials

Materials

The Adapt BB 2.0 uses a mix of raw materials [heel and tongue pull tab] along with textiles and TPU. It’s not my ideal setup, but it worked well and got the job done.
This setup also keeps the weight down a bit. While weight may be an overrated aspect of a basketball shoe, the Adapt BB 2.0 weighs 19.60 oz — and even for a “heavy” basketball shoe… these things are heavy as hell. So, shaving weight where they could was something I don’t disagree with. Again, the materials worked well so from a performance perspective there isn’t anything to complain about.
Adapt BB 2.0 Fit

Fit

The fit… now this is where I just haven’t loved either of the two Adapt BB models at all.
First off, I went true to size (in both versions) and I feel that is the best option. Wide footers may want to go 1/2 size up, but normal footers should be good going true to size.
Now, the laceless system is a hit or miss for me. I thought it was okay in the Air Jordan 33. Great in the Nike Kobe AD FF. And with each of these Adapt BB models I’ve just been “meh” about it. This 2.0 version I do like more than the original overall in terms of the fit, but I still don’t have a need for a laceless shoe over one with laces. There will be some people that could use a laceless shoe and I just happen to not be one of them.
The cable placement on the Adapt BB 2.0 does a much better job at securing your foot and locking you into all sections of the shoe — forefoot, midfoot and heel. However, the power-lacing aspect just isn’t my jam. I can’t seem to get the shoe tight enough without causing cramping or cutting off circulation in my feet. I had the same issue with the original model, and while it is better with the Adapt BB 2.0, it’s still an issue for me. I have to wear them with the cables pretty loose and this is just something I don’t really enjoy at all. Which is ironic as the motorized lacing is the coolest part of the damn things.
Adapt BB 2.0 Support

Support

Despite having to wear the shoe rather loose, the support was pretty damn good. The heel counter works great and the TPU wings located at the lace buttons also helped keep my foot on the footbed. Thank goodness as that was the one area I was really worried about once I’d get the “laces” to a point to where they were comfortable for me. At the midfoot is where the motor is housed, and it’s pretty rigid there, which ends up helping with torsional rigidity.

Overall

Overall, I found that the Nike Adapt BB 2.0 was better than the original Adapt BB, but I still don’t feel that these are necessarily for me.
I prefer laces. Better materials — even though this setup works fine. And more importantly, I like to have a more reliable traction setup.
While price never equates to performance, I cannot help but factor in the $400 price tag these are listed at. This isn’t some shoe I’m choosing to buy at a reseller’s listed price. The $400 is the starting price at retail. I can find shoes on clearance from a year ago that I feel out-perform the Adapt BB 2.0…and then I can buy four pairs of them and still come in under $400. I understand that factoring in the price tag is biased on my part, but I can’t help it with this one.
However, the Jordan Why Not ZER0.3  is solid in most areas. Cushion being my personal favorite aspect of the shoe. I could even deal with the traction a bit, but the shoe being too tight or too loose is the part where they end up losing me.
If you’re ball’n like that and wish to have the latest and greatest in technology then this is pretty much where it’s at. However, if you just want a good shoe at an affordable price then you can literally go with anything else.

2020年3月6日星期五

Jordan Why Not ZERO.3 Performance Review

No.3 for Russell Westbrook… Is the crazy look is backed up with crazy performance? There’s only one way to find out. Welcome to the Jordan Why Not Zero.3 performance review. Read on…

MAIN SPECS


WEIGHT: 459.2 g. / 16.2 oz
TECH: ZOOM AIR
TYPE: MID-TOP
COLORWAYS: 4+
FIT: TRUE TO SIZE
RETAIL PRICE: $130
BD RATING: 8.2/10
BEST PLACE TO BUY: FINISH LINE | BASKETMANIA

PERFORMANCE



MATERIALS

The heavy textile/synthetic paneling for the upper is back, but this time around, in a noticeably lighter form factor. Everything about this upper screams speed, agility, and one-to-one fit, and that’s exactly how I felt in the Why Not Zero.3 after a quick one session break-in process.
Performance wise, the upper is a true modern classic that will serve well any type of playstyle since that minimalistic set-up doesn’t take away any of support capabilities, so you do have an all-around upper to enjoy.
Still, from a practicality standpoint, this is the stuff that won’t serve you more than a season if you’re a serious baller.

CUSHION

Instead of a regular forefoot Zoom Air bag found on the last model, the Why Not Zero.3 stacks same located & sized forefoot Zoom Air Turbo unit, but unlike in the Kyrie 6, where it was first introduced, this time, I did feel pretty substantial performance boost compared to the classic one.
This Zoom Air Turbo version has parallel segmentations instead of a web-like pattern in the Kyrie 5. So maybe that’s the case why this iteration does feel more active. Or it’s just simply because they’re using softer Phylon to unlock more freedom for Zoom Air to do its thing. Either way, the Zero.3’s set-up is more fun, more bounciness, more responsiveness & more impact protection than ever before going from heel to toe.
I can only see true guards hating on them a tad bit due to not having an elite level of court feel. If that’s the case, the Kyrie line is the answer. Everyone else should definitely fall in love with this tooling or at least have something to enjoy.

TRACTION

So it’s a multi-directional traction pattern that I wouldn’t call it a herringbone, more like a second-row cousin which is still a promising thing, except it isn’t. Once they met the hardwood, straight out of the gate I knew it’s going to be tons of “fun”.
Those outsoles couldn’t keep up with my lateral movements, especially with those sharp ones. It was that slip & bite type of consistent performance which you definitely don’t want it to be as a part of your game. But it’s better than having your bite inconsistent and all over the place for sure. That being said, if your game heavily relies on your on-court movement, the Why Not Zero.3 might be a true pain in the ass.
The linear movements, on the other hand, were covered perfectly fine, had zero problems whatsoever. And the dust problem wasn’t really a problem for them. Just a quick/light wipe and you’re ready to go back in play.
It was any surprise to experience that slip & grip issue to go incognito or at least to a certain level where it didn’t affect my game once I through them outside. However, outdoor hoopers stop right there, sadly enough this is not a shoe for you since that rubber compound is atrociously soft.

FIT

It’s that type of situation where you don’t need to think too much – true to size should fit the majority of you. The only ones who need to be beware are obviously our wide footers, highly recommend trying them in store if possible. Just don’t go for a bigger size if they do feel to snug to your liking. Just give them a few runs to adjust to your foot for a perfect fit.
The overall fit was, like I said before, a modern classic type of performance. It’s something that Russ’s signature line didn’t adopt until this model, but here we have it. That combination of a lightweight/pliable upper and smooth heel-to-toe transition just simply pushes you to move forward. And with all of the lock-in features the shoe just soaks up your foot for a true one-to-one experience.

SUPPORT

As long as Russell Westbrook will be such an explosive threat in the league, his signature performers will hold the top spot as one of the most supportive on-court sneakers in the game, and the Jordan Why Not Zero.3 is no an exception.
Although a thinner upper means less support, you can be completely calm about that since it has a few additional support features to back it up. The midfoot strap is one of them, and unlike the majority of them acting as a prop or design piece, this does offer some serious midfoot lockdown & lateral protection to go with. Same thing with the lacing system, it’s an up & under type of contraption which has an advantage over the standard one for better lockdown performance. Lastly, your lateral movements are protected by the zig-zag type of midsole extension on the upper, as well as an internal heel counter to make sure your heel ain’t going anywhere. And don’t forget that well known heavy internal padding that Air Jordan always gives us. So freaking comfy.

OVERALL

As much as the Jordan Why Not Zero.3 is an all-around performer, you can’t ignore the fact that it’s mainly shifted towards a flashy, agile and athletic player like Westbrook himself. However, to be the shoe for that group of players, it has to have great traction which in this case, the Zero.3 does not check that box, unfortunately. I would really want to love this sneaker since the rest of the aspects are freaking awesome, though, that lack of grip keeps me from that. It might be the pattern’s fault or the fact that they used so many different colors on the outsole. Fingers crossed it’s the second one.
Let me know if the solid rubber option does perform better. If so, I will do a revisit review with a different colorway.

2020年3月3日星期二

Basketball Shoes 2019 Rankings + Review

Yep I’m way behind so to expedite the process I left out the pics for the time being. It’s almost March (thank you leap year!!) so hope this helps everyone out. If you read my Pricing 101, you’d know the longer you wait, the better the prices get so if you were waiting for my 2019 review you get low prices and a good guide all in one!
Kyrie 6
I never got around to writing about Kyrie 6 and I was trying to review it before I did this year end but we’re almost into March so yea…sorry I’ve just gotten too busy with life’s.
The Kyrie 6 is a great shoe all the way around just go up half a size for a more comfortable fit. Great traction, Zoom Turbo feels pretty good plus traction, support, containment are all great. I definitely enjoyed it more than the 5 probably due to a little softer feel underfoot. Nothing bad to say about it at all as you can see from its ranking below.
My 2019 Rankings
Since I didn’t review a whole shit ton of shoes and actually went after shoes I knew (thought) I’d like, I was able to compile a nice little list. This is only for shoes released in 2019 FYI
From worst to first(s)
  • Curry 6 (I thought it released in 2018 but nope it was Jan 2019)
  • NB Omn1
  • Nike Zoom Freak 1 (too flexible in midfoot iffy traction on dusty floors)
  • Dame 6 (too tippy for me)
  • Why Not Zero 2
  • Dame 5
  • Pro Model Bounce
  • Curry 7
  • PG3
  • Spawn 2019
  • Kyrie 6
  • Harden V4*
  • AJ 34 *
  • Kobe IV Protro *
  • KD12*
Nobody really cares about anything but the top 5 but they should. Everything except the bottom few are excellent all around shoes that have no major weaknesses. Take your pick from the list because they are all on sale except for the Kobe 1 and the Omn1 (artificial limited supply). Despite the weaknesses of the Freak1, I really enjoyed playing in it and for some reason I just balled out in it (I think I averaged 25-30 over a nice little stretch in them). Just comes to show you it ain’t the shoes so don’t base your purchases off any type of lists or shoetubers. I like a well rounded shoe that isn’t overly squishy, is supportive, stable and just covers all the bases. Of course I love me some good traction and all of these have you covered. Personally I love the Kobe IV bc the IV and I have a deep history and mental connection that you can’t replace (great games = great memories= confidence). If I were to pick one other than the Kobe IV, I’d pick the KD XII. Pure Full length Zoom, not overly soft, low to the ground, great traction all right out of the box. If I were on a more limited budget, I’d go Harden IV. Great all around and I picked up some last week for $62.50. (Told you adidas prices drop like rocks). The AJ 34 is also great with no glaring weakness although cushioning could feel a little more fun but hey that’s what the KD12 is for. I think I’ve pushed more friends into the Kd12 than any other shoe in recent years because it was so damn fun to play in a reminded me of what fun you could have with the KD line. Plus it was very Zoom BB feeling which is one the purest Zooms you’ll ever feel.
Best Budget
  • Spawn
  • Dame 5
  • Harden V4
I’m still perplexed how people use retail prices as the basis for a budget shoe. I wrote an extensive pricing guide to help those who think retail means the price you pay. Price is the price of the shoe at the time of purchase not the retail list price. So if you’re buying two months after a general release you’ll pay a lot less than someone who buys stupidly on release day..especially if that shoe is from Adidas or UA. All that being said, if you want to spend less on the sticker price, the Spawn and Dame are the way to go. Dame hit the swaggiest shot ever in PG’s face and they sell for under $50 a year later. Great overall shoe although cushioning was a little Ho Hum for me. You can splurge more and go with Hardens as well if you don’t base your numbers in retail. Already on sale for $104 plus Adidas discounts and you get a great shoe for $80 or less. Thanks for being unlikeable James! The spawns are ugly and on sale everywhere so if you are paying retail for them, you just wasted fifty bucks. Great shoe awesome traction with the right amount of cushioning even if it has zero relation to the original spawn aside from the name.
Best Sig Shoe
See Rankings
I mean how do you pick ? It’s basically the same list up top. Who wears team shoes nowadays anyways? I honestly think this year you pick by going with your favorite player and or your favorite looking shoe. Mine just happens to be the Kobe IV Carpe Diem which has always been one of the shoes I just love to look at and wear on court. As I said in my review, I got more compliments on those than any recent shoe I’ve reviewed. Well AJ Alpha 1 is up there too.
Best traction
  • Kd12
  • Curry 7
  • PG3
  • Kyrie 6
  • Aj 34
  • Kobe IV
All these are great but if I had to pick one for simply traction, I’d go with the .. Spawn ?!Pliable soft rubber just works like a beast. I mean everything I listed above are excellent but the spawn just bites like a bulldog.
Cushioning
  • Kd12
  • Aj34
  • Harden V4/Dame 6
FLZ directly underfoot just makes the KD12 feel great. The AJ 34 is a bit muted but still feels good and Lightstrike just feels great out of the box. I still don’t trust its durability but hey they are practically half price now so buy two and rotate. Man adidas prices 😂
Best fit
  • Kobe IV
  • Harden V4
  • Kyrie 6
  • AJ 34
The Kobe IV wins this category hands down even if it’s from 2008. Just a perfect fit for me and nimble as can be. See I can rhyme in threes.
Best retro
  • Kobe IV
  • Pro Model Bounce
Aside from a switch in the forefoot, these are very true to the original which is all I wanted out of the Protro. As I said in my Kobe V review, Kobe was never my favorite player but I loved his shoes. Without the Kobe IV, I really doubt we’d see the proliferation of low tops like we see today.
I also really enjoyed the Pro Model Bounce and it can more than hold its own versus any modern shoe. If only it didn’t get so damn hot..but at least it looks hot too.
2020 vs 2019
If you were wondering how 2020 shoes have stacked up, don’t worry you aren’t missing anything. PG4 is solid but I still like the PG3 and 2 more. The Kobe V would be the only shoe I’ve tried this year that I’d seriously consider playing in so let’s keep our fingers crossed that Nike opens the floodgates for Kobe fans and sneakerheads alike. It’s funny yet sad how $180 doesn’t sound so bad once someone is gone. #ripall9